Prevalence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome IBS and Its Risk Factors among Medical Students in Hail University

 

Fatmah Fahad Alreshidi1*, Munira Abdulkarim Alsammari2, Arin Essa Almallahi2, Khulud Saud Alshammari2, Ebtehaj Saud Almughais1, Farida Habib Khan1, Sadaf Anwar3, Dalal Alayed4

1Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

2College of Medicine, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

3Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

4Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.

 

*Email: [email protected]


ABSTRACT

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) incidence and its related risk factors greatly vary among communities. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of irritable bowel syndrome IBS and modifiable risk factors amongst medical students at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia. The Methodology of the study involved a cross-sectional examination performed at Ha’il University, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, during the period from November 2021 to February 2022. About 308 medical students were included in this study. About 21.5% of the participants were previously diagnosed with IBS and 23.9% of the contributors were found to fit Rome IV criteria for IBS diagnosis. Regarding modifiable risk factors, around 63.9% were detected with stress and 63.6% claimed lack of exercise. IBS prevalence amongst medical students at the University of Ha'il was among the relatively higher rates, locally and globally. Stress and physical inactivity were the most modifiable risk factors in this study population.

Key words: Irritable bowel syndrome, Medical students, Risk factors, Rome IV criteria


INTRODUCTION

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic efficient gastrointestinal (GI) syndrome, which is more frequent among females. The common features of IBS comprise bloating, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and different bowel movements with alteration of diarrhea and constipation [1, 2].

Many modifiable risk factors have been linked to the etiology of IBS involved a combined genetic predilection, bowel microbial alternation, changed gut-brain relations, mucosal inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity, and psychosocial aspects could have contributed to IBS progress [3, 4]. Stress and lack of physical activity were also reported as IBS risk factors [5, 6].

The prevalence rates of IBS are usually influenced by the diagnostic criteria employed. The diagnostic method is important for realizing the burden of disease, comparing worldwide subpopulations, creating pathophysiologic investigation, sharing health care and research resources, and highlighting new therapies. There are considerable procedural drawbacks in the epidemiology of IBS, so establishing local and international IBS prevalence rates is challenging. The Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study was intended to settle these difficulties and attain more acceptable outcomes [7]. IBS is usually diagnosed by Applying Rome IV or Rome III criteria. It was found that applying the Rome IV criteria has more significant diagnostic acumens than the Rome III principles in the IBS diagnosis, though the clinical relevance is doubtful [8].

Variable prevalence rates of IBS were reported from different regions in Saudi Arabia [9, 10]. Therefore, the present study aimed to measure the irritable bowel syndrome IBS frequency and modifiable risk factors amongst medical students at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this survey, a cross-sectional analysis was performed at Ha’il University, Ha’il, Saudi Arabia, during the period from November 2021 to February 2022. The study involved 308 medical students from the College of Medicine, University of Ha'il. Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire designed for this purpose. The questionnaire was distributed through multiple social media applications. The questionnaire was distributed in Arabic and was taken and validated from the previous study in Riyadh City (Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 2020) [11]. The questionnaire consisted of three sections. In the first section, Sociodemographic data were obtained, including sex, age, educational level, occupation, body mass index, and marital status of the medical students. The second section involved questions concerning IBS clinical data, management, knowledge, and awareness about symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of IBS. The third section involved questions regarding Personal habits & stress risk factors and the etiology of IBS among medical students by their socio-demographic data of IBS. The consent of participants was obtained at the beginning of the questionnaire. Data were evaluated with IBM Statistical Package for the Social Science version 23 statistical software used to carry out the analysis throughout this study. Logistic regression analysis is the preferred method since the variable of interest is a binary outcome, i.e., whether the student has inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS) or not. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically important.

Ethical consent

Each participant consented by introducing acceptance of participation before filling out the questionnaire. The research has been revised and ratified by the research ethics committee (REC), at the University of Ha'il, Saudi Arabia, No: H2021-209.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Three hundred and eight (308) participants complete the questionnaire. Tables 1 and 2 are details of the research group sociodemographic features. Men encompassed 56.5% of the research group, and roughly (54%) which is between 22-25. Most of the study participants are in their clinical years (59%). The most of the participants were single (97%), living in their family home (73%). About (43%) of participants reported a family history of IBS, while 11% of the total sample physicians previously diagnosed them as having IBS.

 

Figure 1. Description of participants by prevalence rates

 

Table 1. Distribution of the study population by demographical characteristics

 

 

Total

Yes (IBS)

No (IBS)

No

%

No

%

No

%

Academic phase

Pre-clinical

120

39.0%

28

23.3%

92

76.7%

Clinical

181

58.8%

35

19.3%

146

80.7%

Intern

7

2.3%

4

57.1%

3

42.9%

Age in years

 

18-21

129

41.9%

26

20.2%

103

79.8%

22-25

165

53.6%

38

23.0%

127

77.0%

> 25

14

4.5%

3

21.4%

11

78.6%

Gender

Male

174

56.5%

30

17.2%

144

82.8%

Female

134

43.5%

37

27.6%

97

72.4%

Body mass index

Underweight

46

14.9%

10

21.7%

36

78.3%

Normal

151

49.0%

30

19.9%

121

80.1%

Overweight

76

24.7%

16

21.1%

60

78.9%

Obese

35

11.4%

11

31.4%

24

68.6%

Marital status

Unmarried

299

97.1%

64

21.4%

235

78.6%

Married

9

2.9%

3

33.3%

6

66.7%

Living with whom?

With my family

225

73.1%

45

20%

180

80%

At students housing

6

1.9%

1

16.7%

5

83.3%

Alone

56

18.2%

15

26.8%

41

73.2%

With friends

21

6.8%

6

28.6%

15

71.4%

Family member/friend

45

14.6%

17

37.8%

28

62.2%

                 

 

Table 2. Distribution of the study subjects by socioeconomic characteristics

Category

Variable

Total

Yes (IBS)

No (IBS)

No

%

No

%

No

%

Family history of IBS

Yes

133

43.1%

13

9.8%

120

90.2%

No

175

56.9%

64

36.6%

111

63.4%

Type of own car

Don’t have a car

10

3.2%

5

50.0%

5

50.0%

Small car

86

27.9%

18

20.9%

68

79.1%

Intermediate care

192

62.3%

36

18.75%

156

81.25%

Big car

20

6.5%

8

40.0%

12

60.0%

Who drives the car

Taxi

11

3.6%

5

45.5%

6

54.5%

My self

205

66.6%

33

16.1%

172

83.9%

Private driver

47

15.3%

12

25.5%

35

74.5%

Monthly income

< 5000 SR

24

7.8%

6

25.0%

18

75.0%

5000-10000 SR

49

15.9%

13

26.5%

36

73.5%

10000-15000 SR

66

21.4%

7

10.6%

59

89.4%

15000-20000 SR

71

23.1%

18

25.4%

53

74.6%

> 20000 SR

98

31.8%

23

23.5%

75

76.5%

P: Pearson X2 test; $: Exact probability test; * P < 0.05 (significant)

 

The IBS predominance based on Rome IV measures in the research was 22% (Table 3). Predominantly IBS in females was more than males (28% and 17%). Among IBS subtypes, mixed (16%) and constipation-predominant (24%) subtypes were dominant. Only 31 (41%) of the total 76 cases were previously diagnosed by a physician.

Table 3. IBS clinical data and management among medical students at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia (n=67).

Clinical data

No

%

The onset of having IBS

   

Before university

22

34.4%

During university

42

65.6%

Who diagnosed IBS

   

Physician

31

47.0%

My self

26

39.4%

Family

9

13.6%

Consulted a IBS specialist?

   

Yes

28

41.8%

No

39

58.2 %

Received treatment for IBS

   

Yes

32

50%

No

32

50%

Duration of having treatment

   

No treatment

35

53.0%

< 3 months

15

22.7%

3-6 months

6

9.1%

> 6 months

10

15.2%

How often have you felt discomfort or pain anywhere in your abdomen?

Never

3

4.5%

Sometimes

29

43.3%

Most times

27

40.3%

All times

8

11.9%

Does the discomfort or pain persist for 6 months or longer?

Yes

51

76.1%

No

16

23.9%

This pain is accompanied by

   

No pain/ Nothing accompanies it

13

19.4%

More desire for defecation

41

61.2%

Less desire for defecation

7

10.4%

Uncontrolled defecation

6

9.0%

Does pain or discomfort improve or stop after defecation?

Becomes better

44

65.7%

No change/ No pain

19

28.3%

Worse

4

6.0%

Does this pain increases during the menstrual cycle?

Yes

11

28.9%

No

27

71.1%

In the past three months, have you had?

 

Mixed (D&C)

11

16.4%

Diarrhea

14

20.9%

Constipation

16

23.9%

Urgency for defecation

18

15.7%

Sense of incomplete evacuation

45

39.1%

 

Regarding Table 3 Personal habits & stress risk factors, about (12%) of participants were smokers, and (36%) practiced physical exercise. It depicts the connection concerning the psychological trait of participants and IBS; 64% of medical students and interns who experienced mental distress during the 6 months prior to the research had IBS. After analysis, the table also revealed the prevalence of IBS among participants who had an anxiety problem (prevalence of IBS was 25.3, 24.0, and 31.2% among students with severe anxiety, moderate anxiety, or slight).

Table 4. Personal habits & stress risk factors and etiology of IBS among medical students by their socio-demographic data

Personal habits & stress factors

Suffered from IBS

p-value

Yes

No

No

%

No

%

Sleep duration / day

.000

< 3 hours

9

50.0%

9

50.0%

3-8 hours

43

18.9%

184

81.1%

> 8 hours

15

23.8%

48

76.2%

Smoking duration

.000

Non-smoker

54

19.9%

217

80.1%

< 3 years

3

21.4%

11

78.6%

3-6 years

4

36.4%

7

63.6%

6-9 years

3

50.0%

3

50.0%

> 9 years

3

50.0%

3

50.0%

Do you have bouts of anxiety, stress, or depression?

.000

Yes

57

28.9%

140

71.1%

No

10

9.0%

101

91.0%

If yes, the degree of stress/anxiety

.000

Slight

14

24.1%

44

75.9%

Normal

7

18.4%

31

81.6%

Moderate

22

29.7%

52

70.3%

Severe

18

39.1%

28

60.9%

How many hours do you exercise a day?

.000

Not practice exercise

43

21.9%

153

78.1%

< 1 hour

3

42.9%

4

57.1%

1-2 hours

17

18.3%

76

81.7%

> 2 hours

4

33.3%

8

66.7%

How many cups of coffee do you drink per day?

.000*

Never / irregular

14

17.9%

64

82.1%

1-3 cups

37

18.6%

162

81.4%

3-5 cups

12

54.5%

10

45.5%

> 5 cups

4

44.4%

5

55.6%

You preferred food

.000*

Proteins

31

22.3%

108

77.7%

Carbohydrates

30

21.7%

108

78.3%

Fruits & vegetables

2

4.0%

24

96.0%

All foods

4

80.0%

1

20.0%

P: Pearson X2 test; $: Exact probability test; * P < 0.05 (significant)

 

The worldwide incidence of IBS is roughly 11.2% in the overall population, which differs regionally [12]. Our study resulted in a prevalence of 21.5% of IBS among the medical students and interns of Hail University in Hail city, KSA. 23.9% fit Rome IV principles for the IBS diagnosis which is higher than a similar study was done in 2018 in our collage of medicine which reported a prevalence of 18% of medical students are having IBS [13]. In Saudi Arabia, 16.3% of medical doctors have IBS [14] and in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia, IBS prevalence was 16% [15]. However, our study result is lesser than a study in Japan 25.2% of the male nursing and medical school students have IBS [16]. In Nigeria, 26.1% of medical students also have IBS [17]. In Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, the prevalence was 35% among medical students who have IBS [11]. In Najran City, Saudi Arabia, 39.8% of male secondary school students exhibited IBS signs evocative [18]. The disparity of our results with those of the cited published studies may be attributed to the research group variability, diagnostic criteria, age group, and learning environment. The difference in sample size may also be another reason for this difference in disparity. It turns out that IBS is increasing these days worldwide and among medical students at Hail University in Hail city of Saudi Arabia. There was no substantial alteration in terms of the occurrence of IBS between male and female participants. This result would mean the gender is unrelated to IBS, which means everyone can get it. In this study, stress (63.9%) and lack of exercise (63.6%) are the highest risk factors for IBS. This study confirms that medical students experience increased stress. In this study, the habits (stress, sleep duration, lack of exercise, drinking coffee, and type of food show a highly significant association with IBS.

CONCLUSION

IBS prevalence amongst medical students at the University of Ha'il was among the relatively higher rates, locally and globally. Stress and physical inactivity were the most modifiable risk factors in this study population.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS : The authors would like to thank all medical students at the college of medicine, the University of Ha'il for their generous contribution to this study.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST : None

FINANCIAL SUPPORT : None

ETHICS STATEMENT : None

References

1.       Sebastián Domingo JJ. Irritable bowel syndrome. Med Clin (Barc). 2022;158(2):76-81. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2021.04.029

2.       Bonetto S, Fagoonee S, Battaglia E, Grassini M, Saracco GM, Pellicano R. Recent advances in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021;131(7-8):709-15. doi:10.20452/pamw.16067

3.       Ng QX, Soh AYS, Loke W, Lim DY, Yeo WS. The role of inflammation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). J Inflamm Res. 2018;11:345-9.

4.       Johansen SG, Ness-Jensen E. The changes in prevalence and risk of irritable bowel syndrome over time in a population-based cohort, the HUNT study, Norway. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022:1-7. doi:10.1080/00365521.2022.2028005

5.       Buselli R, Veltri A, Corsi M, Marino R, Necciari G, Baldanzi S, et al. Irritable Bowel Syndrome prevalence and work ability in a sample of healthcare workers exposed to occupational stress. J Psychosom Res. 2021;148:110566. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110566

6.       Fani M, Mostamand J, Fani M, Chitsaz N, Feizi A. The effect of aerobic exercises among women with mild and moderate irritable bowel syndrome: A pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019;23(1):161-5. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.02.003

7.       Sperber AD. Epidemiology and Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An International Perspective. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2021;50(3):489-503. doi:10.1016/j.gtc.2021.04.001

8.       Black CJ, Craig O, Gracie DJ, Ford AC. Comparison of the Rome IV criteria with the Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome in secondary care. Gut. 2021;70(6):1110-6. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322519

9.       Aljammaz KI, Alrashed AA, Alzwaid AA. Irritable bowel syndrome: Epidemiology and risk factors in the adult Saudi population of the central region. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(10):1414-8. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp38219

10.    Bin Abdulrahman KA, Alenazi NS, Albishri SB, Alshehri FF. Association of Migraine and Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Saudi Arabia: A Nationwide Survey. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:8690562. doi:10.1155/2022/8690562

11.    AlButaysh OF, AlQuraini AA, Almukhaitah AA, Alahmdi YM, Alharbi FS. Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome and its associated factors in Saudi undergraduate students. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(2):89-93. doi:10.4103/sjg.SJG45919

12.    Lovell RM, Ford AC. The global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: the official Clin Practice J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2012;10(7):712-21.

13.    Alshammari OM, Almuslam AS, Alrashidi AA, Alharbi KF, Alqasem AA, Aljubour ZA, et al. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome among medical students in hail University, Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;71(2):2581-4.

14.    AlAmeel T, Roth LS, Al Sulais E. The Prevalence of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Among Board-Certified Medical Doctors In Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Study. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020;3(6):e32-6.

15.    Arishi AM, Elmakki EE, Hakami OM, Alganmy OM, Maashi SM, Al-Khairat HK, et al. Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Prevalence and Risk Factors in Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15979. doi:10.7759/cureus.15979

16.    Okami Y, Kato T, Nin G, Harada K, Aoi W, Wada S, et al. Lifestyle and psychological factors related to irritable bowel syndrome in nursing and medical school students. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46(12):1403-10. doi:10.1007/s00535-011-0454-2

17.    Okeke EN, Agaba EI, Gwamzhi L, Achinge GI, Angbazo D, Malu AO. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in a Nigerian student population. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2005;34(1):33-6. 

18.    Alshahrani AS. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Irritable Bowel Syndrome among Male Secondary School Saudi Students in Najran City, Saudi Arabia. Med J Cairo Univ. 2020;88:1917-21.