2020 Volume 9 Issue 2
Creative Commons License

Review on Metformin Effect on Male Reproductive System

 

Shiemaa D. Alzain 1*, Mahmoud M. E. Mudawi 1, Abdel Wahab H. Mohamed 2

1 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

2 Faculty of Pharmacy, the National Rebat University, Khartoum, Sudan.

*Email: Shaimaa.Dafullah @ nbu.edu.sa

 

ABSTRACT

Male infertility and issues of impaired fecundity have been currently a global problem. Diabetes mellitus can influence male fertility either directly or indirectly due to abnormal spermatogenesis, which results in reduced sperm quality. Most reported cases of diabetes are of type 2 DM cases, frequently treated with oral anti-diabetic drugs. Metformin is considered first-line therapy for the treatment of T2DM. This drug is an oral insulin-sensitizing agent that can elevate insulin sensitivity and reduce plasma fasting insulin. The main metabolic action of metformin target the liver. However, it was indicated that metformin acts on many organs of the body which include the male reproductive system. With the increasing numbers of diabetic individuals among younger people, there is an enhancement in the utilizaton of metformin in individuals of this age group. Therefore, it is critical to recognize the role of metformin in male fertility. In this review, we are presented with the most recent data accessible regarding the investigation of the influences of metformin on the male reproductive system. Together with the discussion of these influences, their importance to male fertility is also argued.

Key words: Metformin, Oral Hypoglycemic Agents, Diabetes mellitus, Fertility, Erectile Dysfunction, Reproductive system.

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes is one of the primary causes of mortality [1], morbidity, and long-term health issues worldwide [2]. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a complex metabolic disorder [3] concerned with hyperglycemia caused by the absence of insulin secretion, impaired insulin action, or both, which is associated with severe impairment in the metabolism of carbohydrates, fats, and proteins [4]. Diabetes Mellitus is a global epidemic illness influencing over 400 million adults worldwide, and unfortunately, it is expected to increase to over 600 million in 2040 [4].

There are two main sorts of diabetes mellitus; type 1 diabetes is caused by an absolute shortage of insulin secretion; whereas in the other, which is more prevalent, type 2 diabetes is produced by a mixture of resistance to insulin action and inadequate insulin secretion [5].

The number of DM type II cases among the age group of 20-74 years in Yazd was 21.4 per 1000 of a population per year. The analysis showed that there are many risk factors of DM like smoking, increasing body mass index, increased waist circumference, high blood pressure, and raised triglyceride, cholesterol, and uric acid levels [6].

A high body mass index (BMI) contributes less to the increased risk of T2D than the increased visceral obesity, and/or ectopic fat (liver fat) [7].

Regular consumption of sweetened beverages is somewhat associated with weight-gain and considered to be a risk factor of T2DM and cardiovascular disease [8]. Although smoking is identified to reduce body weight, it is correlated with central obesity, also rises inflammation and oxidative stress, and β-cell destruction [9].

Patients with type two diabetes mellitus have an enhanced mortality and morbidity rate compared with non-diabetics and are more probable to develop coronary artery, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular illnesses [10].

Some studies showed that intensified oxidative stress which is following elevated blood glucose implicated in creating diabetes complications, lowering serum concentration of testosterone besides the negative impact on the reproductive system like reduction in accessory sex glands weight, reducing sperm content in the epididymis and increasing basement membrane thickness is reported in diabetic patients [11].

The effects on the human vascular tree -directly or indirectly- are the major source of morbidity and mortality in both type one and type two diabetes. Usually, the harmful influences of hyperglycemia are classified into macrovascular complications (heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and stroke) and microvascular complications (diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy) [12], in both types 1 and 2 DM, improved blood glucose level will decrease the progression of diabetic retinopathy, and duration of diabetes is considered to be noteworthy risk factors [13].

Oral Hypoglycemic Agents

In patients with type 2 diabetes, pharmacological treatment should be started when glycemic control is not reached or if HbA1C rises to 6.5% after 2–3 months of lifestyle modification [14], Criteria for initiation of therapy with an oral agent versus insulin are discussed among diabetologists, but the decision should be taken by the specialist and patient to obtain the optimum results [15].

Biguanides classes like metformin acting by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis mostly through potentiating the impact of insulin, decreasing hepatic extraction of certain substrates like (lactate), and reverse the influences of glucagon. Similarly, metformin can reduce the rate of glycogenolysis and lowering the influence of hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase. Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake into skeletal muscle is supported by metformin [16], Its popularity originates from its capacity to lower blood glucose without inducing hypoglycemia or weight gain while maintaining an exceptional safety profile [17]. Metformin may accumulate when renal function is insufficient because it is excreted by the kidneys [18].

Sulfonylureas class like Glyburide, glipizide, glimepiride, tolazamide, and tolbutamide, sulfonylureas exert its action by enhancing peripheral glucose use through two mechanisms of action, by stimulating hepatic gluconeogenesis, and by increasing the number and sensitivity of insulin receptors decrease hepatic glucose output, and increase insulin receptor sensitivity at peripheral target tissues [19].

For treating type 2 diabetes, thiazolidinedione (TZD) is a very strong insulin sensitizer, Restoration of insulin sensitivity is a dominant strategy for treating type 2 diabetes [20].

Alpha Glycosidase inhibitors inhibit many alpha-glucosidase enzymes like (maltase), consequently retarding the absorption of sugars from the gut [21].

Meglitinides are insulinotropic agents, released in 1995 and approved for clinical utilization in adults with non-insulin-dependent diabetes in 2000. They are insulin secretagogues molecules, faster hypoglycemic action, and shorter duration of action in contrast with sulfonylureas, thus come up with better control of postprandial hyperglycemia and reduction of the risk of late hypoglycemia [22].

Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors such as Linagliptine, Saxagliptin, Sitagliptin, and Alogliptine, indicate a group of oral hypoglycemic agents that block the inactivation of the “incretin” hormones, namely glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and therefore influence glucose control by numerous procedures, including improvement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, decelerated gastric emptying, and lessening of postprandial glucagon and food intake [23].

Fertility

The capability to establish a clinical pregnancy is recognized as fertility [24]. Infertility is explained as the incapability to get pregnant after one complete year of regular, unprotected sexual intercourse [25]. It can also be expressed as the failure of a couple to conceive after 1 year of regular sex without the intrusion of contraception in women <35 years.

 

Effect of Drugs on Fertility

Infertility may result from the use of many drugs. This occurrence may be the consequence of an influence on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis or a direct toxic impact on the gonads [26].

Metformin was a promotive drug for fertility particularly in females, shown to increase fertility consequences in females with insulin resistance correlated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in obese males with decreased fertility. Metformin controls the menstrual cycle, reduces the occurrence rate of cesareans, and lower the number of premature births [27].

Beta-blockers and calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) appear to play a main role on male fertility, resulting in different cases of azoospermia and/or oligozoospermia, CCBs, like amlodipine, can lessen testosterone level, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, leading to influence on spermatogenesis and sperm parameters [28].

Research has suggested that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) therapy is associated with human infertility, thus, inhibit ovulation in all mammalian species examined so far, likely because of the blockage of cyclooxygenase 2, the inducible isoform of cyclooxygenase (COX), that is the rate-limiting enzyme in prostaglandin synthesis. COX-2 inhibition plays a key role in ovulation, fertilization, and implantation [29]. Besides, chemotherapy treatments can result in ovarian failure. Histological investigations in human ovaries have revealed that chemotherapy treatments can cause loss of primordial follicles and ovarian atrophy [30]. Numerous investigations have recommended that recreational drugs might affect human reproductive health adversely. Cannabis smoking damages male fertility, with an influence on the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis, sperm synthesis, and sperm activity, as cannabinoid receptors are expressed in the anterior pituitary, Leydig cells, Sertoli cells and in testicular cells [31].

Sulfasalazine an anti-inflammatory drug which often prescribed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and had been used for the initial treatment of irritable bowel illness and long-term maintenance of disease remission, Levi et al. first noted 4 cases of male infertility related to sulfasalazine use in 1979, and in all cases, success to conceive after discontinuation of sulfasalazine drug. Subsequent studies stated that this medication causes reversible non-dose-dependent quantitative and qualitative deformities of sperm in > 80% of men [32]. 

Anabolic steroids - often taken by bodybuilders and athletes, these, particularly after long term utilization can seriously decrease sperm count and mobility. A study on sperm parameters indicated that based on the duration of the utilization of anabolic steroids and the time since the last drug administration before the survey, it concluded that bodybuilders have lower percentages of motile sperm in compare to the healthy participant, but sperm production can return to normal rates after stopping the consumption of anabolic steroids [33].

Another risk factor for infertility is age; some investigations said that fecundity in females starts to reduce during the 4th decade of life [34].

It is known that smoking has a damaging influence on fertility from long ago. In 1983, Osler, together with his working group found that Tobacco consumption caused infertility in about a thousand females where no other factor was found [35]. Alcohol consumption may lower male fertility, besides the established knowledge that alcohol consumption causes significant changes in spermatozoon shape; among which are the spermatozoon head’s cleavage, curling of tails, and mid-portion distension, it is also thought of to manipulate spermatogenesis as well as the secretion of testosterone. It is found that, in the alcoholic population, azoospermia follows spermatids degeneration in the seminiferous tubules which was found in turn to be due to changes in the hormonal axis controlling testicular function and/or male’s accessory glands [36].

 Being obese or overweight - found to be the principal cause of female infertility, in obese women, gonadotropin secretion is affected because of the increased androgens peripheral conversion to estrogens. In obese women, insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia may lead to hyperandrogenemia. The sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), growth hormone (GH), and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP) are reduced and leptin levels are enhanced. This deranges the hormonal axis that controls the gonads [37].

Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on male fertility

Diabetes-related sperm nuclear and mtDNA damage decrease diabetic men reproductively [38]. Both T1DM and T2DM influence the testicular function and spermatogenesis [39]. At the electron microscopic level sperm motility was also meaningfully decreased, sperm from diabetics patient displayed more immaturity- and apoptosis-associated abnormality [40]. Analysis of the ejaculate, using light microscopy, showed minimal effect on semen quality. The molecular analysis on the other hand demonstrated that diabetic men have a significant DNA fragmentation and pointed out that oxidative damage is the cause [39]. It is reported that the sperm DNA diabetes – caused damage will negatively affect the quality of embryo as early as the second day of early embryonic development, this would then continue as the embryo is transferred, lead to higher abnormality rates at implantation and negative outcomes [41].

 Men with diabetes may be at high risk of low testosterone levels and reduced sex steroid status [42], diabetes affects penile tissues differently as a result of cellular heterogeneity. These changes could have an impact on blood flow and tissue resistance, and therefore might adversely affect erection which leads to retardation of ejaculation ability [43]. Diabetes also causes impaired relaxation of cavernosal smooth muscle due to nitric oxide (that is derived from the endothelium), this may be a side effect of glycosylation products [44], and the occurrence of Erectile Dysfunction in men with diabetes is about three-fold higher than in the general population as it is correlated with diabetic neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease [45], as it may also be the presenting symptom for DM and may predict later neurologic squeals [44].

Effect of oral hypoglycemic agents on male fertility :

The study of sulfonylurea's effect on the fertility parameter stated that it is highly possible when using sulfonylurea as a primary treatment of diabetes to restore total serum testosterone levels together with testosterone secretion index values in T2DM men in their middle-age [46].

According to study on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) effect on fertility of obese mice, it stated that Exenatide reduced total body weight but not reproductive organs weight, as it improved the basic sperm parameters, improved the reduced sperm mitochondrial activity, recovered the impaired sperm integrity and up-regulated the expression of GLP-1R in testis [47].

Rabbani et al. (2008) assessed the role of Pioglitazone (PIO) and Rosiglitazone (RSG) on the rate of nuclear and germinal cell damage by utilizing sperm shape abnormality, bone marrow micronucleus (MN) test, and sperm count in normal animals. They noted that RSG lessened the P/N (polychromatic and normochromic erythrocytes) ratio at 10 and 100 mg/kg without revealing influence on the rate of micronucleated erythrocytes, sperm shape morphology, and sperm count. P/N ratio and sperm count tend to modify with a greater dose (100 mg/kg) of P/O than the tested doses and demonstrated lessened MN in normochromatic erythrocytes and percentage of sperm morphological abnormality in comparison with the control group [48].

A research assessed the influence of acarbose on the fertility of STZ-induced diabetic rats, it was observed, that the reduction on the numbers of spermatogonial cells, spermatocytes and Sertoli cells in the testis was lower in the diabetic rats treated with acarbose than that detected on untreated diabetic rats, so it concluded that acarbose has positive effect toward male fertility [49].

In one study of a case report, stated that the semen quality of the patient deteriorated sharply following three-month Dipeptidyl peptidase –IV inhibitor (DPP-IV I) administration. Semen quality recovered after the drug is withheld; subsequently, the DPP-IV inhibitor was re-instituted. The quality of the semen deteriorated again but, fortunately, it was recovered after the drug withdrawal. Semen quality deterioration cause remains largely unknown; in this clinical course, it is suggested that DPP-IV inhibitor may affect spermatogenesis. So that, in young adults, treatment with DPP-IV inhibitor warrants careful attention when it is administered [50].

It is stated that insulin-dependent male diabetics have enhanced semen volume, sperm count, and morphology. But, sperm motility was better in metformin users than insulin users. Nevertheless, both insulin and metformin utilization insignificantly influence serum testosterone levels in the diabetics. Consequently, metformin might play a better role than insulin in the improvement of sperm motility in the diabetic male population [51].

Metformin effect on male fertility

Metformin belongs to the biguanides group which is old agents utilized for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) that acts by decreasing hepatic glucose output and, to a lesser extent, enhancement of the insulin sensitivity in hepatic and peripheral tissues [52]. The drug considered of choice in the treatment of type two diabetes mellitus is Metformin. This has long been considered so. The clinical guidelines most widely recognized and the consensus recommendations prefer its use was monotherapy initially for hyperglycemia [53]. As it enhances peripheral sensitivity to insulin, it exerts decreases in hepatic glucose production, reduces the absorption of glucose in the gut, and enhances peripheral glucose uptake and utilization [54].

The commonest Metformin side effects (affect 10% of patients few days into treatment) are gastrointestinal, including mild loss of appetite, and a metallic taste, nausea, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea [55]. Slow-dosage titration is suggested to lessen these influences, and should be started at 500 mg twice daily with meals, and can be enhanced by 500 mg (maximum dosage of 2,000 mg daily) at two-week intervals to decrease gastrointestinal side effects. A novel extended-release formulation was newly presented to the market, permitting a more convenient once-daily dosing regimen [56].

Metformin is the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes, mainly, in overweight and obese patients with normal kidney function; a related concern that has been raised was its usage in non-diabetics for primary inhibition of diabetes (i.e., pre-diabetic or obese individuals). This concern rises the usage of this drug by these groups [57].

Metformin is extensively applied as first-line therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes accompanied by lifestyle modification because of its efficiency and low side effect profile. Metformin monotherapy is predictable to lower the HBA1c by 1.0-2.0%. There are only a few conditions in which metformin should not be utilized, including chronic kidney disease and gastrointestinal intolerance [58].

Metformin is a hydrophilic biguanide compound with high polarity, positively charged, and has low molecular weight with pleiotropic actions. It extensively accumulates in some tissues including the liver, pancreas, muscle, adipose tissue, pituitary, hypothalamus, and the gonads [59].

Numerous experimental and clinical studies over the last decade, have linked it to male infertility since it influences sperm function [57]; however, such a direct link yet to be established. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and fresh understanding of the influence of metformin, as an oral agent utilized universally, on male fertility and gonadal hormones.

Effect of Metformin on rat testis

Metformin has a strong Protective effect on testicular ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats, as ischemic reperfusion reduced the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme and testicular Johnsen's scores together with an elevation in myeloperoxidase (MPO) as well as malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, metformin had restored testicular Johnsen's scores, SOD activity, MPO and MDA levels [60].

Increasing body weight fits in reverse with testis weight, clear pathological modifications in the testicular tissue were characterized by small, atrophic, and distorted seminiferous tubules and destroyed basement membrane, Metformin treatment improved the semen profile, this might be due to weight loss that it promotes. Reduced testicular cell apoptosis and enhanced testicular weight by metformin resulted in the correction of the metabolic disorder and restoration of hormonal [61].

Metformin for T2DM male patients in reproductive age can be considered as an appropriate oral hypoglycemic ant diabetic drug, as some investigations noted that it decreases Sertoli Cells’ mRNA amount and levels of proteins for glycolysis-associated transporters but enhances their activity; and induces antioxidant activity by stimulating alanine production and maintains the NADH/NAD+ equilibrium. Metformin enhances lactate levels in SCs thereby providing the nutritional support and it also provides anti-apoptotic influences in developing germ cells [62].

As stated in many investigations in diabetic induced rats, diabetes mellitus leads to significantly ultrastructural modifications of Sertoli and Leydig cells that cause changes in pituitary-derived gonadotropins, and these modifications, in turn, influence spermatogenesis in rats. These modifications also influence normal function and organization of spermatogenic cells, and after induction of diabetes, modification of germinal epithelial cells of seminiferous tubules populations arise [63]. One investigation noted that the co-administration of Metformin and honey could prevent damages induced by diabetes in testicular tissue, simultaneous administration of metformin and honey could fairly up-regulate diabetes-induced decreased levels of insulin, LH, FSH and testosterone and could increase endocrine activities of the testes, partly by regulating levels of gonadotropins. [64].

Metformin impact on sperm quality

There has been current controversy regarding modifications in sperm counts. World widely, it has been stated that in the last two decades that sperm count is decreasing compared with the last 60 years [65].

There is now a provided proof that male obesity negatively influences male fertility potential not only sperm quality decrease, but also, especially, modifying testicular- germ cell physical and molecular structure and in the long run influence mature sperm. Current data has confirmed that obesity in men impairs children's metabolic and reproductive health. These recommend that paternal health cues are inherited to the next generation with the mediator happening via the sperm most likely. O note is that, the molecular profile of testicular germ cell and sperm from obese adult males is modified with alterations to epigenetic modifiers [66], metformin therapy and improved diet could increase sperm quality, sperm motility, sperm concentration and promote the antioxidant capacity of the testis in obese rats [67].

Another study said that metformin harms somebody organs like the testis. In which, it increases the lipid peroxidation levels and reduces the epididymal sperm count and motility and testicular superoxide dismutase, glutathione, Catalase, and serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), as well as conjugated bilirubin, were markedly influenced. Also, marked necrosis, degeneration of seminiferous tubules, and defoliation of spermatocytes in the testis are observed [68].

Numerous investigations revealed that diabetes is associated with the high stage of oxidative DNA damage and with the elevated susceptibility to mutagens and the reduced effectiveness of DNA repair [69]; metformin significantly reduced genomic variability and cell proliferation modifications induced by diabetes in somatic and germinal cells in a dose-dependent manner (2500, 500, >100 mg/kg); metformin may protect from genomic instability caused by hyperglycemia, reduce the oxidative stress, and protect from sperm malformation as it is a non-genotoxic or cytotoxic compound [70].

The administration of metformin plus pioglitazone meaningfully enhanced the P/N ratio (polychromatic: normochromatic erythrocytes), decreased the number of micronucleated erythrocytes, decreased the sperm morphology defects and enhanced the caudal sperm count compared with the untreated diabetic condition. Moreso, the metformin and pioglitazone combination promoted the antioxidant status in diabetic animals [71].

In another study, results show that there is an insignificant variation concerning semen volume, liquefaction time, pH, and normal morphology at baseline and after three months of treatment with metformin 850 mg two times per day, but there is a significant difference regarding sperm count and sperm activity at the baseline (before treatment) and after three months of treatment with metformin and decrease in LH, FSH, prolactin, estradiol, and testosterone [72].

Effect of Metformin on Erectile Dysfunction (ED)

The total frequency of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men in their 2nd decade was 18.4%; The results revealed that erectile dysfunction influences 18 million men in the United States. The frequency of erectile dysfunction was associated with age in a highly positive manner, but it is primarily common among men with one or more risk factors like hypertension, and a history of cardiovascular illnesses, even after drop age consideration. Among diabetic men, the prevalence of erectile dysfunction was 51.3%. Multivariable analyses showed that erectile dysfunction was independently correlated with lower education, diabetes, and lack of exercise [73].

Erectile dysfunction may result from psychological, neurological, hormonal, arterial, or cavernosal impairment or a combination of these factors like drug-induced and systemic disease or aging-related factors [74].

There have been numerous groupings that were proposed for Erectile Dysfunction. Some are on the basis of the cause (iatrogenic, diabetic, and traumatic), and others are on the basis of the neurovascular mechanism of the erectile process like failure to start (neurogenic), failure to fill (arterial), and failure to store (venous). Arteriogenic Erectly Dysfunction can occur through three major mechanisms have (I) impairment of Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation which is mediated by reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO); (II) elevation of Sympathetic nerve activity, resulting in enhancement of basal and myogenic tone within the corpus cavernousoum, (III) atherosclerotic luminal narrowing, leading to decreased penile in-flow [75].

In males, insulin resistance has been found to triggers endothelial dysfunction and this contributes to erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular disease [76].

Insulin resistance is considered as the main risk factor for ED, in a state of insulin resistance, basal levels of serum insulin are increased. This rise of insulin complicates the erectile function process which is mentioned above by the following mechanisms: (I) decreasing nitric oxide bioavailability and inducing vasoconstriction; (II) improving the sympathetic nervous system activity; (III) promoting atherogenic risk factors such as hypertension. Furthermore, chronic hypertension nurtures an environment for inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial injury, result in further impairment in the dilation of arteries, arterioles, and sinusoids of the corpus cavernous; Consequently, metformin may be beneficial to address erectly dysfunction, normally attributed to impaired endothelial-dependent vasodilation [77].

Although, Rey-Valzacchi et al. (2012) assumed that improving metabolic profile leads to a beneficial influence on cavernosal NO signaling. The vascular modification by metformin was induced irrespective of whether there is significant glycemic control influence by metformin in streptozotocin-diabetic rats or not. This proposes that metformin has a primary and secondary influence on vessels [78].

Labazi et al. (2013), produced a model of erect dysfunction in a rat model utilizing angiotensin II, which results in contraction of the corpus cavernosum. Metformin 500 mg/kg/day reverse ED induced by angiotensin II and normal intracavernosal muscle tone had been achieved as well as enhanced endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation [79].

Moreover, metformin had attenuated the reactions of the sympathetic nervous system, especially of those alpha-1 adrenoceptors which are activated by norepinephrine and restoring corpus cavernosum erectile response [77].

In an investigation, the influence of treatment with metformin on the response to sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction and insulin resistance was assessed in a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind placebo research. It noted that after treating with metformin, patients with erectile dysfunction experienced a notable enhancement in the international index of erectile function score and a significant reduction in homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) score [80].

 

CONCLUSION

Metformin is an oral anti-diabetic agent with anti-hyperglycemic activity considered as the first line of treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, as it is a well-tolerated, reasonable price; it is used by over 100 million diabetes patient over the world. Recently, it has been reported that this drug can act in different organs and tissues including the male reproductive system. However, the existing literature presents some contradictory findings on the influence of metformin on this system. While several studies provide evidence that metformin improves sperm motility, sperm count, sperm concentration, and antioxidant status and decreases oxidative stress, some studies didn’t prove that according to the impact of other factors, which will lead us to do further studies.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there was no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Karthikeyan G, Thangavelu L, Nazer M R, Roy A. Glucose uptake potential in L6 Myotubes by FicusRacemosa. J. Adv. Pharm. Edu. Res. 2018; 8(4): 21-24.
  2. Aziz N, Wal A, Wal P, Pal R S. Preparation and Evaluation of the Polyherbal Powder: The Nature’s Pharmacy for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Pharmacophores. 2019; 10(1): 60-70.
  3. Almoraie N M. The Role of Ipomoea Batatas Leaves Extract on the Treatment of Diabetes Induced by Streptozotocin. Pharmacophores. 2019; 10(3): 14-20.
  4. Sheikh Hosseini S, Gol A, Khaleghi M. The effects of the Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 on the oxidative stress of reproductive system in diabetic male rats. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2019;17(7):493–502. Published 2019 Jul 31. doi:10.18502/ijrm.v17i7.4861
  5. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2009;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S62–S67. doi:10.2337/dc09-S062
  6. Namayandeh SM1, Karimi A2, Fallahzadeh H3, Rahmanian M4, Sadr Bafghi SM1, Soltani M1, Hadiani L1., The incidence rate of diabetes mellitus (type II) and its related risk factors: A 10-year longitudinal study of Yazd Healthy Heart Cohort (YHHC), Iran., Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Mar-Apr;13(2):1437-1441. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
  7. Kolb H, Martin S. Environmental/lifestyle factors in the pathogenesis and prevention of type 2 diabetes. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):131. Published 2017 Jul 19. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0901-x
  8. Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després JP, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010;121(11):1356–1364. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185
  9. Chang SA. Smoking and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2012;36(6):399–403. doi:10.4093/dmj.2012.36.6.399
  10. S.L. Nuttall, F. Dunne, M.J. Kendall, U. Martin, Age-independent oxidative stress in elderly patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 92, Issue 1, January 1999, Pages 33–38, https://doi.org/1093/qjmed/92.1.33
  11. Nasrolahi O, Khaneshi F, Rahmani F, Razi M. Honey and metformin ameliorated diabetes-induced damages in testes of rat; correlation with hormonal changes. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(12):1013–1020.
  12. Michael J. Fowler, MD, Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications of Diabetes, Clinical Diabetes 2008 Apr; 26(2): 77-82, https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.26.2.77
  13. Shaya FT, Aljawadi M. Diabetic retinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2007;1(3):259–265.
  14. Chaudhury A, Duvoor C, Reddy Dendi VS, et al. Clinical Review of Antidiabetic Drugs: Implications for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017;8:6. Published 2017 Jan 24. doi:10.3389/fendo.2017.00006
  15. Luna B, Feinglos MN. Oral agents in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, Am Fam Physician. 2001 May 1;63(9):1747-56. PMID: 11352285
  16. Wiernsperger NF, Bailey CJ. The antihyperglycaemic effect of metformin: therapeutic and cellular mechanisms. Drugs. 1999;58(Suppl 1):31–39. discussion 75–82
  17. Foretz M, Guigas B, Bertrand L, Pollak M, Viollet B. Metformin: from mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell metabolism. VOLUME 20, ISSUE 6, P953-966, DECEMBER 02, 2014
  18. Inzucchi SE, Lipska KJ, Mayo H, Bailey CJ, McGuire DK. Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(24):2668–2675. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15298.
  19. Sola D, Rossi L, Schianca GP, et al. Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice. Arch Med Sci. 2015;11(4):840–848. doi:10.5114/aoms.2015.53304
  20. Ye J. Challenges in Drug Discovery for Thiazolidinedione Substitute. Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2011;1(3):137–142. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2011.06.011
  21. van de Laar FA. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in the early treatment of type 2 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(6):1189–1195. doi:10.2147/vhrm.s3119
  22. Guardado-Mendoza R, Prioletta A, Jiménez-Ceja LM, Sosale A, Folli F. The role of nateglinide and repaglinide, derivatives of meglitinide, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(5):936–943. doi:10.5114/aoms.2013.34991.
  23. Makrilakis K. The Role of DPP-4 Inhibitors in the Treatment Algorithm of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: When to Select, What to Expect. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(15):2720. Published 2019 Jul 30. doi:10.3390/ijerph16152720
  24. Vander Borght, M., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012
  25. TAMMY J. LINDSAY, MD, Saint Louis University Family Medicine Residency, Belleville, Illinois, KIRSTEN R. VITRIKAS, MD, David Grant Medical Center Family Medicine Residency, Travis Air Force Base, California, Evaluation and Treatment of Infertility, Am Fam Physician. 2015 Mar 1;91(5):308-314.
  26. Buchanan JF, Davis LJ. Drug-induced infertility., Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1984 Feb;18(2):122-32.
  27. Faure M, Bertoldo MJ, Khoueiry R, et al. Metformin in Reproductive Biology. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:675. Published 2018 Nov 22. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00675
  28. Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Iaconianni P, Gatti S, Padula F. Male Infertility during Antihypertensive Therapy: Are We Addressing Correctly The Problem?. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016;10(3):267–269. doi:10.22074/ijfs.2016.4633
  29. Gaytán M, Morales C, Bellido C, Sánchez-Criado JE, Gaytán F., Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and ovulation: lessons from morphology., Histol Histopathol. 2006 May;21(5):541-56. doi: 10.14670/HH-21.541.
  30. Bedoschi G, Navarro PA, Oktay K. Chemotherapy-induced damage to ovary: mechanisms and clinical impact. Future Oncol. 2016;12(20):2333–2344. doi:10.2217/fon-2016-0176
  31. Sansone A, Di Dato C, de Angelis C, et al. Smoke, alcohol and drug addiction and male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):3. Published 2018 Jan 15. doi:10.1186/s12958-018-0320-7
  32. Shin T, Okada H. Infertility in men with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016;7(3):361–369. doi:10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i3.361
  33. El Osta R, Almont T, Diligent C, Hubert N, Eschwège P, Hubert J. Anabolic steroids abuse and male infertility. Basic Clin Androl. 2016;26:2. Published 2016 Feb 6. doi:10.1186/s12610-016-0029-4
  34. Deatsman S, Vasilopoulos T, Rhoton-Vlasak A. Age, and Fertility: A Study on Patient Awareness. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016;20(3):99–106. Published 2016 Aug 1. doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20160024
  35. Olsen J, Rachootin P, Schiødt AV, Damsbo N. Tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and infertility. Int J Epidemiol. 1983 Jun;12(2):179-84.
  36. La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Balercia G, Vicari E, Calogero AE. Does alcohol have any effect on male reproductive function? A review of literature. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(2):221–225. doi:10.1038/aja.2012.118
  37. Dağ ZÖ, Dilbaz B. Impact of obesity on infertility in women. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16(2):111–117. Published 2015 Jun 1. doi:10.5152/jtgga.2015.15232
  38. Agbaje IM, Rogers DA, McVicar CM, McClure N, Atkinson AB, et al. Insulin dependant diabetes mellitus: implications for male reproductive function. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1871–7.
  39. Ding GL, Liu Y, Liu ME, et al. The effects of diabetes on male fertility and epigenetic regulation during spermatogenesis. Asian J Androl. 2015;17(6):948–953. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.150844
  40. Baccetti B, La Marca A, Piomboni P, Capitani S, Bruni E, Petraglia F, De Leo V. Insulin-dependent diabetes in men is associated with hypothalamo-pituitary derangement and with impairment in semen quality. Hum Reprod. 2002 Oct;17(10):2673-7.
  41. Simon L, Murphy K, Shamsi MB, Liu L, Emery B, Aston KI1, Hotaling J, Carrell DT. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Hum Reprod. 2014 Nov;29(11):2402-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu228. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
  42. ao QM, Wang B, An XF, Zhang JA, Ding L. Testosterone level and risk of type 2 diabetes in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(1):220–231. doi:10.1530/EC-17-0253
  43. Abidu-Figueiredo M, Ribeiro IC, Chagas MA, Cardoso LE, Costa WS, Sampaio FJ. The penis in diabetes: structural analysis of connective tissue and smooth muscle alterations in a rabbit model. BJU Int. 2011 Aug;108(3):400-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09944.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
  44. Tom F Lue, M.D., William O Brant, M.D., Alan Shindel, M.D., and Anthony J Bella, M.D, Sexual Dysfunction in Diabetes, Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al., editors.South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000-.
  45. Rendell MS, Rajfer J, Wicker PA, Smith MD. Sildenafil for treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Sildenafil Diabetes Study Group. JAMA. 1999 Feb 3;281(5):421-6.
  46. Wong L, Chen HM, Lai SQ, Yang HZ, Kuang J, Pei JH. Effects of sulfonylurea as initial treatment on testosterone of middle-aged men with type 2 diabetes: A 16-week, pilot study. J Diabetes Investig. 2015;6(4):454–459. doi:10.1111/jdi.12324
  47. Zhang E, Xu F, Liang H, Yan J, Xu H, Li Z, Wen X, Weng J. GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Exenatide Attenuates the Detrimental Effects of Obesity on Inflammatory Profile in Testis and Sperm Quality in Mice, Am J Reprod Immunol. 2015 Nov;74(5):457-66. doi: 10.1111/aji.12420. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
  48. Rabbani SI, Devi K, Khanam S. Effect of thiazolidinediones on the erythropoietic and germinal cells in the male Wistar rats. Clin Med Oncol. 2008;2:423–429. doi:10.4137/cmo.s678
  49. R S Tavares, S Escada-Rebelo, A F Silva, M I Sousa, J Ramalho-Santos, and S Amaral, Antidiabetic therapies and male reproductive function: where do we stand?, © 2018 Society for Reproduction and Fertility 2018, Volume 155: Issue 1, Page(s): R13–R37, https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-17-0390.
  50. Author links open overlay panelHatsukiHibiaTadashiOhoriaYoshiakiYamadab, DPP-IV inhibitor may affect spermatogenesis, Diabetes Research, and Clinical Practice, Volume 93, Issue 2, August 2011, Pages e74-e75.
  51. Awais Ali Zaidi   Mahtab Ahmed Khan   Ali Sharif   Lubna Shakir   Atif Irshad   Arsalan Ali   Zaib Ali Shaheryar , Comparative study of sperm motility in Metformin-using and Insulin-dependent diabetics, Biomedical Research and Therapy, DOI: 10.15419/bmrat.v4i06.180, Volume & Issue: Vol 4 No 06 (2017), Page No.: 1388-1399, Published on 2017-06-25
  52. Clifford J. Bailey, Ph.D., M.R.C.Path., and Robert C. Turner, M.D. Metformin, February 29, 1996, N Engl J Med 1996; 334:574-579, DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199602293340906
  53. Irons BK, Minze MG. Drug treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients for whom metformin is contraindicated [published correction appears in Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017 Oct 31;10 :457]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014;7:15–24. Published 2014 Jan 18. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S38753
  54. Dumitrescu R, Mehedintu C, Briceag I, Purcărea VL, Hudita D. Metformin-clinical pharmacology in PCOs. J Med Life. 2015;8(2):187–192.
  55. Lorenzati B, Zucco C, Miglietta S, Lamberti F, Bruno G. Oral Hypoglycemic Drugs: Pathophysiological Basis of Their Mechanism of Action, Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010;3(9):3005–3020. Published 2010 Sep 15. doi:10.3390/ph3093005
  56. Luna B1, Feinglos MN., Oral agents in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus., Am Fam Physician. 2001 May 1;63(9):1747-
  57. Saleem Ali Banihani1, Effect of metformin on semen quality, Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. vol.52 no.4 São Paulo Oct./Dec. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-82502016000400002
  58. Tricia Santos Cavaiola, MD and Jeremy H Pettus, MD. Management Of Type 2 Diabetes: Selecting Amongst Available Pharmacological Agents, www.endotext.org
  59. Bertoldo MJ, Faure M, Dupont J, Froment P. Impact of metformin on reproductive tissues: an overview from gametogenesis to gestation. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2(6):55. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.06.04
  60. Asghari A1, Akbari G2, Meghdadi A3, Mortazavi P4. Protective effect of metformin on testicular ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2016 Jun;31(6):411-6. doi: 10.1590/S0102-865020160060000008.
  61. Yan WJ, Mu Y, Yu N, et al. Protective effects of metformin on reproductive function in obese male rats induced by high-fat diet. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(7):1097–1104. doi:10.1007/s10815-015-0506-2
  62. Alves MG, Martins AD, Vaz CV, et al. Metformin and male reproduction: effects on Sertoli cell metabolism. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171(4):1033–1042. doi:10.1111/bph.12522
  63. Kianifard D, Sadrkhanlou RA, Hasanzadeh S. The ultrastructural changes of the Sertoli and Leydig cells following streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15(1):623–635.
  64. Nasrolahi O, Khaneshi F, Rahmani F, Razi M. Honey and metformin ameliorated diabetes-induced damages in testes of rat; correlation with hormonal changes. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013;11(12):1013–1020.
  65. Sengupta P, Dutta S, Krajewska-Kulak E. The Disappearing Sperms: Analysis of Reports Published Between 1980 and 2015. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11(4):1279–1304. doi:10.1177/1557988316643383
  66. Palmer NO, Bakos HW, Fullston T, Lane M. Impact of obesity on male fertility, sperm function, and molecular composition. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2(4):253–263. doi:10.4161/spmg.21362
  67. Fang X, Xu QY, Jia C, et al. Metformin improves epididymal sperm quality and antioxidant function of the testis in diet-induced obesity rats. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2012 Feb;18(2):146-9.
  68. Adaramoye O1, Akanni O, Adesanoye O, Labo-Popoola O, Olaremi O. Evaluation of toxic effects of metformin hydrochloride and glibenclamide on some organs of male rats. Niger J Physiol Sci. 2012 Dec 18;27(2):137-44.
  69. Blasiak J, Arabski M, Krupa R, Wozniak K, Zadrozny M, Kasznicki J, Zurawska M, Drzewoski J. DNA damage and repair in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mutat Res. 2004 Oct 4;554(1-2):297-304.
  70. Attia SM1, Helal GK, Alhaider AA. Assessment of genomic instability in normal and diabetic rats treated with metformin. Chem Biol Interact. 2009 Jul 15;180(2):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
  71. Rabbani SI, Devi K, Khanam S. Role of Pioglitazone with Metformin or Glimepiride on Oxidative Stress-induced Nuclear Damage and Reproductive Toxicity in Diabetic Rats. Malays J Med Sci. 2010;17(1):3–11.
  72. Ahmed R. Abu Raghif, Effects of Metformin on Hormonal Profile and Seminal Fluid Analysis in Obese Infertile Male, Raqi Journal of Medical Sciences, ISSN: P16816579, E22244719 Year: 2015 Volume: 13 Issue: 3 Pages: 295-301, Publisher: Al-Nahrain University
  73. Elizabeth Selvin, MPH, a,b Arthur L. Burnett, c  Elizabeth A. Platz, MPHa, Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. Am J Med. 2007 Feb;120(2):151-7.
  74. Lue TF, Erectile dysfunction, N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 15;342(24):1802-13.
  75. Dean RC, Lue TF. Physiology of penile erection and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2005;32(4):379–v. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2005.08.007
  76. Chen S, Wu R, Huang Y, et al. Insulin resistance is an independent determinate of ED in young adult men. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83951. Published 2013 Dec 31. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083951
  77. Patel JP, Lee EH, Mena CI, Walker CN. Effects of metformin on endothelial health and erectile dysfunction. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(3):556–565. doi:10.21037/tau.2017.03.52
  78. Moon KH, Park SY, Kim YW. Obesity and Erectile Dysfunction: From Bench to Clinical Implication. World J Mens Health. 2019;37(2):138–147. doi:10.5534/wjmh.180026
  79. Labazi H, Wynne BM, Tostes R, Webb RC. Metformin treatment improves erectile function in an angiotensin II model of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2013;10(9):2154–2164. doi:10.1111/jsm.12245
  80. Rey-Valzacchi GJ, Costanzo PR, Finger LA, Layus AO, Gueglio GM, Litwak LE, Knoblovits P. Addition of metformin to sildenafil treatment for erectile dysfunction in eugonadal nondiabetic men with insulin resistance. A prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study, J Androl. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):608-14. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.111.013714. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
Issue 1 Volume 14 (2025)