The Role of Pomegranate Peel Extract in Improving Hepatotoxicity, and hMSH2 Expression in CCI4 -Treated Rats

 

Dalia Mostafa Mohammed Domiaty1*

1Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

 

*Email: [email protected]


ABSTRACT

Recently, pomegranate fruit and its leaves have found wide usage as a natural treatment for several ailments. In this study, we investigated the restorative potentials of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel extract against hepatic damage brought on by calcium tetrachloride (CCl4) in rats and its effects on the human mutS homolog 2 (hMSH2) gene expression. Four groups of twenty male Wistar rats (n =5) were created at random. Group I was the untreated control group. Group II was given a dose of 0.4 ml CCl4 intraperitoneally (IP) for two consecutive days/week for 3 weeks. Group III was given a daily dose (500 mg/ kg b.w) of pomegranate peel extract (PPE) for 3 weeks. Group IV received an IP of CCl4 for two consecutive days/week for 3weeks followed by a daily oral dose of (500 mg/ kg b.w) of PPE for 3 weeks. Bodyweight, relative liver weight, serum AST, ALT, bilirubin, tissue GSH, and MDA, the expression of the hMSH2 gene, liver histology, and immunohistochemistry were assessed. Our results showed that the administration of CCl4 to rats did not affect their body weight and relative liver weight. However, CCl4 administration resulted in a decrease in tissue GSH, an increase in serum AST, ALT, bilirubin, lipid peroxidation, modification of liver histology, and immunohistochemistry, and the downregulation of the expression of the hMSH2 gene. Intriguingly, PPE treatment following CCl4 administration to rats attenuated these changes. Taken together, our study reveals the potential of PPE for its use in the treatment of liver damage.

Key words: Hepatotoxicity, Antioxidant, Oxidative stress, Free radicals, Toxicant


INTRODUCTION

The liver is both the largest gland and the largest organ in the mononuclear phagocyte system of the human body [1]. It is composed of kupffer cells, sinusoidal endothelial cells, and hepatic stellate cells and is situated in the upper right region of the abdomen beneath the diaphragm [2]. The liver is essential for the body's detoxification processes, digestion, metabolic control, and maintaining the flow, and safety of compounds that are taken from the digestive system before they enter the circulatory system [1, 3].

Hepatotoxicity can be caused by agents called hepatotoxins or hepatotoxicants [2]. These agents include drugs, (anti-cancer and anti-tubercular drugs, paracetamol, and anti-cancer drugs), chemicals like galactosamine and chloroform, and oxidative species. Anti-tubercular drugs usually result in toxic hepatitis and liver necrosis which could cause encephalopathy and death [4]. Hepatotoxicity can be caused by both direct toxicities of primary compounds and by reactive metabolite/immunologically mediated response [3, 4]. Vaccines, steroids, and antiviral drugs used in liver disease therapy sometimes produce adverse effects [5]. Hepatocytes are damaged by hepatotoxicants by inducing lipid peroxidation and causing oxidative stress to the liver due to chronic treatment or toxic doses [6]. Age, gender, obesity, drug-drug interactions, kidney damage, genetics, and alcohol consumption, are risk factors for hepatotoxicity [7].

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) is a clear, colorless, volatile, and fireproof liquid made up of carbon and four chlorine atoms. The chemical compound occurs both naturally and artificially and has been used in the production of cleaning agents and solvents and in the synthesis of chlorofluorocarbons [8]. Due to its strong hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic, and prooxidant nature, CCl4 is used to induce hepatotoxicity in animal research studies and is used to create hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic cirrhosis, and liver injury [9]. Inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption are the different routes through which CCl4 can easily enter the body [9]. Furthermore, CCl4 is a hepatotoxin that is believed to form free radicals and caused peroxidation after entering the hepatocytes which can lead to the disruption in the liver structure and function [10, 11].

One of the oldest fruits still in existence in the world is pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). It belongs to the family Punicaceae and the genus Punica. The fruit is native to the Middle East and can be found in countries like Iran, India, Afghanistan, and some other Mediterranean countries [12]. The pomegranate is a pharmacologically precious fruit and has been used numerously for cooking and medical purposes. Over the years, research studies have discovered the many health benefits of this plant (fruit, seed, and peel) [13]. The pomegranate peel extract (PPE) is a part of the fruit known to contain high levels of phytochemicals, phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tannins. These phytochemicals and compounds are responsible for the antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, antiulcer, and anti-inflammatory properties of the pomegranate peel extract [14, 15]. The flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins present in the PPE are very important in preventing damage caused by free radicals in the human body [12].

The DNA mismatch repair pathway includes the mismatch repair gene, the human mutS homolog 2 (hMSH2) gene [16]. This gene encodes an important nuclear protein that plays an essential role in nucleotide mismatch recognition in the DNA repair pathway. However, studies have shown that mutations in the hMSH2 gene are associated with the progression in the development of liver disease including hepatocellular carcinoma [17]. Consequently, in this research, we looked at the potential advantages of PPE extract on liver injury induced by CCl4 and determined its effects on the expression levels of the hMSH2 gene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and preparation of extract

The dried peels of pomegranates were obtained from an herbal and folk medicine market in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. These peels were washed, air-dried, and powdered followed by the dissolution of 10 g from this powder in 500 ml distilled water. The extract was filtered, concentrated to 8.5 mg/ml of pomegranate peel extract, and kept till usage at 4 °C.

 

Animals

Male Wistar rats weighing 150-250 g were purchased from the King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Animals were left to acclimatize to the lab ambiance for one week (12hr/12hr light off/on) and fed on a lab animal diet with freely available water. Declaration by Bioethics Committee of Scientific and Medical Research approved this animal experiment with No. HAP-02-J-094.

Chemicals

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, (Missouri, United States) and diluted in olive oil (1:1 v/v). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

Experimental design

Rats were randomly placed into four groups (n = 5) after acclimatization and given the following treatment:

Group I (Control): the control group, received no treatment. Group II (CCl4): This group received CCl4 in olive oil (1:1) intraperitoneally (IP) at a dose of 0.4 ml for two consecutive days/week for 3weeks. Group III (PPE): Animals in this group received pomegranate peel extract (PPE) orally at a dose level of (500 mg/ kg b.w) daily/for 3 weeks. Group IV (CCl4 + PPE): This group received IP of CCl4 for two consecutive days/week for 3weeks followed by a daily oral dose of (500 mg/ kg b.w) of PPE for 3 weeks.

After the three weeks experimental period, food was withdrawn from the animals overnight and they were later euthanized under diethyl ether anesthesia. Following this, blood was drawn from the animals and the liver tissue was removed, rinsed in normal saline, and weighed. Part of the liver was either stored in 10% buffered formalin for histological analysis and immunohistochemical analysis or kept at -80˚C for extraction of RNA. The leftover liver tissue was blended in a 100 mM phosphate buffer with a pH of 7.4 at 14,000 rpm for 30 min.

Assessment of liver damage biomarkers

Using a commercial kit (Diagnostic System Laboratories Inc., USA), the serum concentrations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and bilirubin were measured.

 

Assessment of oxidative stress biomarkers

For this, the supplier’s instructions were followed when measuring the amounts of glutathione (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in the supernatant collected after centrifugation at 14,000 rpm using a commercial kit (MyBioSource, California, USA).

RNA  الدراسة الجزيئية:Extraction and Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)الحامض النووي الرنا:

According to the supplier's recommendations, total RNA was extracted from the liver tissues using a (QIAgen RNeasy mini kit, cat # 74104). Next, 200ng of the extracted RNA was used in cDNA synthesis by the use of the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase System (Promega, USA), and the qPCR reaction was made up of the following components: cDNA, 3 mL; right and left primers (Table 1), 0.5 mL (500 nM); purified water, 1 mL; SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA). To assess the relative mRNA expression of the hMSH2 gene, the 2ΔΔCT method was applied and normalized to the expression of GAPDH.

Table 1. Primer sequences

Isoforms Primers

Primers sequence (5`-3`) Primers sequence (5`-3`)

CYP1A1 F hMSH2 - left

GGG AGG TTA CTG GTT CTG G 5'-TGCTCAAGGACAAAGGCTG-3'

CYP1A1 R hMSH2 right

5'-GGAAATCGGCGAAGTAAATC-3' 5'-GGAAATCGGCGAAGTAAATC-3'

GAPDH F GAPDH - left

GAT GGT GAA GGT CGG TGT G 5'-GAT GGT GAA GGT CGG TGT G-3'

GAPDH R GAPDH -right

ATG AAG GGG TCG TTG ATG G 5'-ATG AAG GGG TCG TTG ATG G-3'

F – Forward, R – Reverse, GAPDH – glyceraldehydes phosphate 3-dehydrogenase

Histopathological studies

The fixation of liver tissue was carried out in 10% buffered formalin, then embedded in paraffin wax after being dried out graded ethanol for a day at room temperature. To evaluate histopathological alterations, hematoxylin, and eosin (H&E) were used to stain the sections of tissue blocks that were cut into thin sections. Light microscope images of stained liver sections were taken at 400x magnification.

 

Immunohistochemistry analysis

Immunohistochemical analysis was done for anti- CK7 and CK19 antibodies using streptavidin-biotin. The liver sections of a thickness of 5 μm and at room temperature were deparaffinized followed by incubation in hydrogen peroxide (0.3%) prepared in methanol for half an hour. The liver sections were incubated with anti- CK7 and CK19 antibodies at a dilution of 1:100 respectively followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin and eosin.

 

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses for this study were conducted using one-way ANOVA, and the data are presented as mean SEM. Dunnett's multiple comparisons test was used to compare means, and a significance level of p less than 0.05 was chosen.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

Body weight and relative liver weight alterations induced by CCl4 administration

The administration of CCl4 to rats has no significant effect on the body weight of rats compared to animals in the control group (Figure 1a). On the other hand, when compared to rats given CCl4, PPE treatment to the rats resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) drop in body weight. In addition, rats treated with PPE after CCl4 administration saw a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in body weight when compared to animals just given only CCl4 (Figure 1a). Furthermore, CCl4 administration to rats resulted in liver weight increased by 9% and 7% in comparison with the PPE-treated group and the control group respectively. Moreover, rats treated with PPE after receiving CCl4 showed a significant reduction in relative liver weight compared to those who received only CCl4 (Figure 1b).

a)

b)

Figure 1. Body weight and relative liver weight alterations induced by CCl4 administration. a) final body weight. b) relative liver weight

 

Protective effects of PPE against liver damage induced by CCl4

To assess the effect of CCl4 on the health status of the liver, we quantified the serum AST and ALT levels, two biomarkers of liver damage. As shown in Figure 2, CCl4 administration to rats, led to a significant increase in the serum AST and ALT levels in comparison to the control (p < 0.0001 for AST and p < 0.01 for ALT) and PPE treated groups (p < 0.001 for AST and p < 0.05 for ALT) respectively. However, PPE administration to rats following CCl4 led to a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in serum AST levels when compared with rats administered only with CCl4. Similarly, rats treated with PPE after receiving CCl4 revealed a significant reduction in the serum levels of ALT in comparison with CCl4-only administered rats (Figure 2b).

 

a)

b)

Figure 2. Effects of CCl4 on serum levels of AST and ALT. a) Serum AST level. b) Serum ALT level.

Antioxidant effects of PPE against CCl4-induced oxidative stress

When compared to the animals in the control group, treatment with CCl4 caused a significant (p < 0.001) drop in the amount of GSH present in the liver tissue. However, when compared to animals given CCl4, rats given PPE saw a considerable rise (p < 0.01) in the GSH content (Figure 3a). In addition, the GSH contents showed no discernible difference from the rats treated with PPE following CCl4 administration and CCl4-only administered rats. Furthermore, CCl4 administration to rats resulted in a significant elevation (p < 0.0001) in the liver MDA content in comparison to the rats in the control group, and the PPE-only administered to rats (Figure 3b). However, PPE treatment to rats after CCl4 administration resulted in non-significant changes in the MDA contents in comparison with rats administered with only CCl4 (Figure 3b).

 

a)

b)

Figure 3. Effects of CCl4 and PPE on GSH and MDA levels. a) Serum glutathione (GSH) level. b) Serum malondialdehyde (MDA) level.

Effects of CCl4 and PPE on serum bilirubin levels and hMSH2 gene expression

Rats administered with CCl4 saw a substantial rise (p < 0.05) in blood bilirubin levels when compared to the control group and rats given PPE, respectively. Interestingly, rats given PPE following CCl4 administration showed a significant reduction in the bilirubin level when compared to the rats in the CCl4-only group. This decrease in serum bilirubin by PPE treatment to the CCl4 administered rats was near normal (Figure 4a). Furthermore, the hMSH2 gene expression levels between the control group and the CCl4-treated group did not differ significantly. Although PPE administration to rats, upregulated the expression of the hMSH2 gene in comparison to the CCl4-only treated group, this does not reach a significant level (Figure 4b). Interestingly, rats receiving both CCl4 and PPE treatment demonstrated significantly higher levels of hMSH2 gene expression (p < 0.01) as compared to rats receiving CCl4 only.

 

a)

b)

Figure 4. Effects of CCl4 and PPE on serum bilirubin levels and hMSH2 gene expression. a) serum testosterone level. b) Relative hMSH2 gene expression.

PPE administration improved liver histology in CCl4-induced liver-injured rats

Hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed that the liver sections from the animals in the control group presented a normal liver histological architecture with normal hepatic lobules, central vein, visible hepatic sinusoids, and hepatic cells (Figure 5a). However, rats administered with CCl4 presented a visible liver injury with an altered liver architecture, and an increased necrotic infiltration (Figure 5b). In addition, rats administered with PPE only showed similar liver architecture when compared to the liver sections from the animals in the control group (Figure 5c). Furthermore, the liver sections from the animals who received treated CCl4 treatment followed by the administration of PPE revealed an improved liver architecture with visibly radiating hepatic cells as compared with the liver sections from CCl4-only administered rats (Figure 5d).

 

a)

b)

c)

d)

Figure 5. Histology of the representative liver sections CCl4 and ART on liver tissue architecture. a) Histology of the liver in the normal control group showing normal liver architecture. b) Histology of the liver sections of the animals in the CCl4-administered group shows damaged liver sections. c) PPE only administered group, showing normal liver architecture. d) CCl4 + PPE group showing improved liver architecture to near normal with visible radiating hepatic cells.

Impact of CCl4 administration on oval cell regeneration

Figure 6 showed the immunohistochemical staining of the cell’s response to damage induced by CCl4 administration against anti-CK7 and anti-CK19 antibodies. The liver sections from animals in the control group for both CK7 and CK19 antibodies showed no visible presence of oval cells (Figures 6a and 6e). However, the liver sections from rats administered with CCl4 showed growing oval-shaped cells located around the periportal region (Figures 6b and 6f). In addition, the sections of the liver of rats administered with CCl4 and treated with PPE showed little oval cells for CK7 antibodies (Figure 6e) but little or no oval cells for CK19 antibodies (Figure 6h).

 

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

g)

h)

Figure 6. Immunohistochemical staining (a, b, c, d) against CK7 and Immunohistochemical staining (e, f, g, h) against CK19. a) Immunohistochemistry against CK7 of the liver in the normal control group showed no visible oval cells. b) Immunohistochemistry against CK7 of the liver sections of the animals in the CCl4-administered group showed growing oval cells. c) Immunohistochemistry against CK7 for PPE only administered group, showing no visible oval cells. d) Immunohistochemistry against CK7 for CCl4 + PPE group showed improved liver architecture to near normal with visible radiating hepatic cells. e) Immunohistochemistry against CK19 of the liver in the normal control group showed no visible oval cells. f) Immunohistochemistry against CK19 of the liver sections of the animals in the CCl4-administered group showed growing oval cells. g) Immunohistochemistry against CK19 for PPE only administered group, showing no visible oval cells. h) Immunohistochemistry against CK19 for CCl4 + PPE group showed improved liver architecture to near normal with visible radiating hepatic cells.

 

The production of reactive oxygen species by aerobic organisms during respiration is unavoidable. However, when the production of ROS becomes abnormally high, it can lead to injury or damage to the cells and tissues. Unregulated lipid peroxidation is responsible for the occurrence of diseases such as liver damage, cardiovascular diseases, and myocardial infarction among others [18]. Due to the major and important roles the liver plays in the body, it is prone to many diseases and toxic agents [19].

This study aims to evaluate the hepatoprotective property of pomegranate peel extract on CCl4-induced liver damage by accessing the body weight and liver weight changes, serum biomarkers, oxidative stress, liver histology, and immunohistochemistry. In contrast to the control group and the rats were given PPE, our findings indicated that there was no appreciable gain in body weight in the CCl4 treatment group. On the impact of CCl4 on body weight, various earlier studies have found a significant decrease. For example, Gazwi et al. [20], and Dutta et al. [21] recorded a reduction in the body weight of the group receiving CCl4 treatment. However, a significant decrease in the body weight of the CCl4 treated group was observed when the PPE was administered to the rats (Figure 1a). This result confirms the body weight-lowering potentials of pomegranate as reported in various previous studies [22, 23]. Interestingly, despite the non-significant change in body weight in the CCl4-treated rats in comparison to the control and PPE-only administered rats, an increase in the liver weight was observed which was ameliorated by the administration of PPE. This increase in liver weight was in agreement with the study of Gazwi et al. [20].

To further determine the hepatotoxic effects of CCl4 and the hepatoprotective effect of PPE, the AST and ALT biomarkers were tested. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are enzymes that are found in the liver, kidney, muscle, and heart. These enzymes’ main functions are to metabolize protein and break down food to produce energy. An increase in their concentration is a symbol of liver injury and disease [24]. Our results showed that the serum levels of AST and ALT significantly increased in response to CCl4 and this agreed with previous studies [18, 25]. This increase in the serum levels of these enzymes has been associated with liver damage since they are usually produced from hepatocytes during hepatonecrosis [26]. The increase in the AST and ALT levels was ameliorated with the administration of PPE which agrees with a previous study that showed that pomegranate peel extract decreased the ALT and AST serum levels [27].

Glutathione is an antioxidant that helps in the detoxification of drugs and xenobiotics. It helps to improve any abnormality in the liver [28]. The GSH protects the cells and tissues against oxidative stress. The inhibition of the production of GSH causes an increase in the quantity of O2 and H2O2 which can result in oxidative stress and ultimately lead to liver damage [21]. In this study, the treatment of rats with CCl4 reduced the GSH level in the liver tissue of these rats in comparison to the control group. This agrees with the results of Ullah et al. [29]. In addition, our results showed that PPE administration to rats increases the levels of GSH in the liver of these rats. However, no significant increase was recorded when PPE was administered to the CCl4-treated group. This result was in disagreement with the study of Ghamry [30] and Ali et al. [31] where PPE significantly elevated the GSH level of the CCl4-treated group. The non-significant increase recorded in our study might likely be due to the short treatment duration. A longer treatment duration might result in a significant increase in the GSH levels.

Furthermore, lipid peroxidation occurs when free radicals or oxidative species attack lipids with carbon-carbon double bonds resulting in cell injury. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is one of the most mutagenic products of lipid peroxidation and has always been used as a biomarker for cell injury or damage [32]. It is an oxidative stress marker that is used to monitor the level of lipid peroxidation [29]. According to our findings, there was no discernible change in the liver MDA content in CCl4-treated rats when administered with PPE and compared to the untreated control rats. However, other studies found a significant decrease in the MDA concentration in the liver homogenate of rats treated with CCl4 and given PPE for 4 weeks [33]. As noted earlier, this non-significance in the MDA levels in PPE + CCl4 rats recorded in our results might likely be due to the short PPE treatment duration.

Bilirubin is a yellowish waste product that is produced during the breakdown of the red blood and excreted through the liver in the urine. An increase in its concentration can result in jaundice and anemia and may signify a liver problem [24]. When the serum bilirubin level was tested, a significant increase was recorded in the group that was given CCl4. The elevation in the bilirubin level could be a result of hepatocellular injury and cholestatic liver diseases [34]. This elevation in the serum bilirubin level was ameliorated significantly when PPE was administered to the CCl4-only treated group.

Furthermore, our results showed that CCl4 administration in rats led to a complete loss of the hMSH2 gene in the CCl4-only treated group, signifying potential genomic instability. However, When PPE was administered to CCl4-treated rats, the expression levels of the hMSH2 gene significantly increased, activating the DNA repair pathway in the liver cells and restoring the structural integrity of the liver.

Finally, the histology and immunohistochemistry of the liver showed that the administration of CCl4 resulted in damage to the liver architecture and the proliferation of oval cells. However, the treatment of rats with PPE after CCl4 administration restored the changes to the liver histology and immunochemistry resulting from CCl4 administration. This result agrees with the decrease in the levels of serum biomarkers of liver damage (Figures 2 and 4a).

 

CONCLUSION

 

In this study, we assessed the role of pomegranate peel extract in improving hepatotoxicity, immunohistochemistry, and the expression of the MSH2 gene in CCl4-treated rats. We showed that the administration of CCl4 to rats did not affect their body weight and relative liver weight. However, CCl4 administration on the other hand resulted in a decrease in tissue GSH, led to an increase in serum AST, ALT, bilirubin, lipid peroxidation, and modification of liver histology and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, PPE treatment following CCl4 administration to rats resulted in a decrease in serum liver damage biomarkers, restoration of liver histology and immunohistochemistry, an increase in the relative liver weight, and the upregulation of the hMSH2 gene expression. Taken together, our study reveals the potential of PPE for its use in the treatment of liver damage.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS : None

CONFLICT OF INTEREST : None

FINANCIAL SUPPORT : None

ETHICS STATEMENT : Declaration by Bioethics Committee of Scientific and Medical Research approved this animal experiment with No. HAP-02-J-094.

References

1.       Hassani M. Liver Structure, Function and its Interrelationships with Other Organs: A Review. Int J Dent Med Sci Res. 2022;4(1):88-92.

2.       Ebtehal F, Ahmady A. Hepatotoxicity and Antioxidants: An overview. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019;9(3-s):1068-77.

3.       Wang Y, Zhang H, Jiang JM, Zheng D, Chen YY, Wan SJ, et al. Hepatotoxicity induced by psoralen and isopsoralen from Fructus Psoraleae: Wistar rats are more vulnerable than ICR mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2019;125:133-40.

4.       Gulati K, Reshi M, Rai N, Ray A. Hepatotoxicity: Its mechanisms, experimental evaluation, and protective strategies. Am J Pharmacol. 2018;1(1):1004.

5.       Hu PF, Xie WF. Corticosteroid therapy in drug‐induced liver injury: pros and cons. J Dig Dis. 2019;20(3):122-6.

6.       Rusyn I, Arzuaga X, Cattley RC, Corton JC, Ferguson SS, Godoy P, et al. Key characteristics of human hepatotoxicants as a basis for identification and characterization of the causes of liver toxicity. Hepatology. 2021;74(6):3486-96.

7.       Todorović Vukotić N, Đorđević J, Pejić S, Đorđević N, Pajović SB. Antidepressants-and antipsychotics-induced hepatotoxicity. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95(3):767-89.

8.       Bencheikh N, Bouhrim M, Kharchoufa L, Choukri M, Bnouham M, Elachouri M. Protective effect of Zizyphus lotus L.(Desf.) fruit against CCl4-induced acute liver injury in rat Evid. Based Complement Altern Med. 2019;2019.

9.       Unsal V, Cicek M, Sabancilar I. Toxicity of carbon tetrachloride, free radicals, and role of antioxidants. Rev Environ Health. 2021;36(2):279-95.

10.    Li X, Wang L, Chen C. Effects of exogenous thymosin β4 on carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury and fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5872.

11.    Xu P, Yao J, Ji J, Shi H, Jiao Y, Hao S, et al. Deficiency of apoptosis-stimulating protein 2 of p53 protects mice from acute hepatic injury induced by CCl4 via autophagy. Toxicol Lett. 2019;316:85-93.

12.    Kaur R, Kaushal S. Chemical composition and antioxidant potential of pomegranate peel (Punica granatum L.) Int J Chem. 2018;22:16-30.

13.    Chen J, Liao C, Ouyang X, Kahramanoğlu I, Gan Y, Li M. Antimicrobial Activity of Pomegranate Peel and Its Applications on Food Preservation. J Food Qual. 2020:8850339.

14.    Sorrenti V, Randazzo CL, Caggia C, Ballistreri G, Romeo FV, Fabroni S, et al. Beneficial effects of pomegranate peel extract and probiotics on pre-adipocyte differentiation. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:660.

15.    Surendhiran D, Li C, Cui H, Lin L. Fabrication of high stability active nanofibers encapsulated with pomegranate peel extract using chitosan/PEO for meat preservation. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2020;23:100439.

16.    Pećina-Šlaus N, Kafka A, Salamon I, Bukovac A. Mismatch repair pathway, genome stability and cancer. Front Mol Biosci. 2020:122.

17.    Marin JJ, Macias RI, Monte MJ, Romero MR, Asensio M, Sanchez-Martin A, et al. Molecular bases of drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers. 2020;12(6):1663.

18.    Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(7):363-83.

19.    Liu H, Zhang Z, Hu H, Zhang C, Niu M, Li R, et al. Protective effects of Liuweiwuling tablets on carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):212.

20.    Gazwi HS, Mahmoud ME. Restorative activity of aqueous extract Mangifera indica leaves against CCl4 induced hepatic damage in rats. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2019;164:112-8.

21.    Dutta S, Chakraborty AK, Dey P, Kar P, Guha P, Sen S, et al. Amelioration of CCl4 induced liver injury in swiss albino mice by antioxidant-rich leaf extract of Croton bonplandianus Baill. Plos One. 2018;13(4):e0196411.

22.    El‐Hadary AE, Ramadan MF. Phenolic profiles, antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic, and antioxidant properties of pomegranate (Punica granatum) peel extract. J Food Biochem. 2019;43(4):e12803.

23.    Soliman ER, Nour S, H Mohmoud A, As Ragab H. Effect of Pomegranate Peel on Body Weight, Blood Sugar and Lipid Levels of Overweight Rats. Alex Sci Exch J. 2022;43(4):949-64.

24.    Himel N. Liver Function tests: Significance of ALT (Alanine aminotransferase) and AST (Aspartate aminotransferase) as markers of Liver injury. 2020. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342477925

25.    Kanawati GM, Al-Khateeb IH, Kandil YI. Arctigenin attenuates CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity through suppressing matrix metalloproteinase-2 and oxidative stress. Egypt Liver J. 2021;11(1):1-7. doi:10.1186/s43066-020-00072-6

26.    Ghosh A, Onsager C, Mason A, Arriola L, Lee W, Mubayi A. The role of oxygen intake and liver enzyme on the dynamics of damaged hepatocytes: Implications to ischaemic liver injury via a mathematical model. PloS one. 2021;16(4):e0230833.

27.    Aboelsoued D, Abo-Aziza FA, Mahmoud MH, Abdel Megeed KN, Abu El Ezz NM, Abu-Salem FM. Anticryptosporidial effect of pomegranate peels water extract in experimentally infected mice with special reference to some biochemical parameters and antioxidant activity. J Parasit Dis. 2019;43(2):215-28.

28.    Weschawalit S, Thongthip S, Phutrakool P, Asawanonda P. Glutathione and its antiaging and antimelanogenic effects. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017;10:147-53.

29.    Ullah H, Khan A, Baig MW, Ullah N, Ahmed N, Tipu MK, et al. Poncirin attenuates CCL4-induced liver injury through inhibition of oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines in mice. BMC Complementary Med Ther. 2020;20(1):115.

30.    Ghamry H. Potential therapeutic effects of pomegranate peel on carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury in rat. Sci J Edu Sci. 2020;12(12):1-19.

31.    Ali D, Jahan A. Hepatoprotective Potential of Pomegranate in curbing the incidence of acute liver injury by alleviating oxidative stress and inflammatory response. Front Pharmacol. 2021:2838.

32.    Mas-Bargues C, Escrivá C, Dromant M, Borrás C, Viña J. Lipid peroxidation as measured by chromatographic determination of malondialdehyde. Human plasma reference values in health and disease. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021;709:108941.

33.    Wei X, Li S, Li T, Liu L, Liu Y, Wang H, et al. Pomegranate peel extract ameliorates liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride in rats through suppressing p38MAPK/Nrf2 pathway. J Funct Foods. 2020;65:103712.

34.    Horvatits T, Drolz A, Trauner M, Fuhrmann V. Liver injury and failure in critical illness. Hepatology. 2019;70(6):2204-15.